The Fundamental Theorems of Modern Welfare Economics, Historically Contemplated

@article{Blaug2007TheFT,
  title={The Fundamental Theorems of Modern Welfare Economics, Historically Contemplated},
  author={Mark Blaug},
  journal={History of Political Economy},
  year={2007},
  volume={39},
  pages={185-207}
}
  • M. Blaug
  • Published 1 June 2007
  • Economics
  • History of Political Economy
Modern welfare economics is formally summed up in two so-called fundamental theorems. The fi rst fundamental theorem states that, subject to certain exceptions—such as externalities, public goods, economies of scale, and imperfect information—every competitive equilibrium is Paretooptimal. The second fundamental theorem states that every Pareto-optimal allocation of resources is an equilibrium for a perfectly competitive economy, provided a redistribution of initial endowments and property… 

Non-redistributive Second Welfare Theorems

The second welfare theorem tells us that social welfare in an economy can be maximized at an equilibrium given a suitable redistribution of the endowments, and it is shown that it is NP-hard to find an optimal clustering in a linear exchange economy with a bounded number of goods and markets.

Islamic Economics and a Third Fundamental Theorem of Welfare Economics

The discipline of economics started as a moral science but became detached from moral concerns over time to emulate natural science and to adopt positivism. Consequently, mainstream economics assumes

The conflict that came with markets. Welfare economics in the history of economic thought

The equivalence of Walrasian market equilibrium and Pareto optimality has become a benchmark against which actual markets are judged. The ruling has been that there is a need to bring in government

Revisiting the History of Welfare Economics

Our forthcoming book, Welfare Theory, Public Action and Ethical Values challenges the belief that, until modern welfare economics introduced issues such as justice, freedom and equality, economists

Walras or Pareto: Who is to Blame for the State of Modern Economic Theory?

ABSTRACT Walras and Pareto are considered founders of the Ecole de Lausanne. However, their points of view on economics as a science were at considerable variance and their appreciation of each other

Economic Policy with and Without Maximizing Rules

This paper contrasts the static neoclassical and the evolutionary views of the economy and economic policy. It responds to Ng's comments on Lipsey's original criticism of third‐best theory. Under a

Normative Trade Theory

It is more than two hundred and fifty years since Montesquieu (1749) wrote his ‘Lettre a William Domville’. In that essay Montesquieu discussed what would now be called the welfare implications of

The Optimal Level of Market Competition: Neoclassical and New Institutional Conclusions Critiqued and Reformulated

This paper examines a fundamental issue in the theory of economic organization: the optimal level of market competition. Answers in neoclassical and new institutional economics are identified and

Adam Smith’s Economics and the Modern Minimum Wage Debate:The Large Distance Separating Kirkcaldy from Chicago

In the post-World War II period the spearhead of opposition to minimum wage (MW) legislation has been economists associated with the Chicago School, such as Friedman, Stigler, and Becker. They have

Policy Implications of Alternative Economic Paradigms: Some surprises from endogenous technological changes

One of the most neglected issues in modern economics concerns the consequences of technological change that is ubiquitous and endogenous. To address these we need to model technology as more than a
...

The Problem of Social Cost Revisited

    D. Regan
    Economics
    The Journal of Law and Economics
  • 1972
SOME years ago, in a paper entitled "The Problem of Social Cost,"' Professor Ronald Coase asserted and argued for a proposition which has since acquired the convenient sobriquet "the Coase Theorem."

The Philosophy of Economics: Welfare Propositions of Economics and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility

Nicholas Kaldor (1908–1986) was born in Budapest and educated in Budapest, Berlin, and at the London School of Economics. In addition to an academic career, which was centered at Cambridge

A critique of welfare economics

A Critique of Welfare Economics was first published in 1950. It was concerned with the exposition, criticism, and appreciation of the theory of economic welfare as it had been developed to that date.

EXISTENCE OF AN EQUILIBRIUM FOR A COMPETITIVE ECONOMY

A. Wald has presented a model of production and a model of exchange and proofs of the existence of an equilibrium for each of them. Here proofs of the existence of an equilibrium are given for an

Welfare Economics And The Theory Of The State

The most general attribute that distinguishes government from other organizations is its coervice role, circumscribing the activities of all of its citizens and the other inhabitants of its

General Equilibrium Theory: An Introduction

Part I. General Equilibrium Theory: Getting Acquainted: 1. Concept and history of general equilibrium theory 2. An elementary general equilibrium model - the Robinson Crusoe economy 3. The Edgeworth

Lectures on public economics

This classic introduction to public finance remains the best advanced-level textbook on the subject ever written. First published in 1980, Lectures on Public Economics still tops reading lists at

Adam Smith's Problems and Ours

The paper contrasts what modern economists, reflecting the priorities of general equilibrium theory, expect to find in the Wealth of Nations with Smith's own much broader theoretical and policy

THE GENERAL WELFARE IN RELATION TO PROBLEMS OF TAXATION AND OF RAILWAY AND UTILITY RATES. IN: RAILWAYS

This classic paper defends the use of marginal cost pricing for railways. The author views his contributions as an extension of Dupuit's fundamental insights concerning the relation between the

Adam Smith’s Theory of Economic Growth

Adam Smith’s theory of economic growth is at first sight startlingly different from that of Quesnay and the Physiocrats. In their argument industry produces no investable surplus, and therefore makes
...